[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] mspec - special memory driver and do_no_pfn handler
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Quite frankly, I don't think nopfn() is a good interface. It's only usable
>> for one single thing, so trying to claim that it's a generic VM op is
>> really not valid. If (and that's a big if) we need this interface, we
>> should just do it inside mm/memory.c instead of playing games as if it was
>> generic.
> Or just use sparsemem and create struct pages for your hw :) we do that
> for SPUs on Cell, works like a charm.

Well then the question is, would it simplify the code using no_pfn in
this case? Hacking up fake struct page entries seems even more of a
hack to me.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-17 10:18    [W:0.070 / U:1.472 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site