lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to
> >visit the page):
> ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile
>
> A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95,
> I would say.

If you would have had a quick look at the results on the webpage you are
commenting on instead of blindly speculating, you'd have known that your
statement is bullshit since both the 2.4 and the 2.6 compiles were done
using gcc 3.3.3.

> Jan Engelhardt

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-16 00:13    [W:0.145 / U:1.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site