lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.16-rc6-rt1
    On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    >
    > * Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote:
    >
    > [...]
    > no. We have to run deadlock detection to avoid things like circular lock
    > dependencies causing an infinite schedule+wakeup 'storm' during priority
    > boosting. (like possible with your wakeup based method i think)
    No, all tasks would just settle on the highest priority and then the
    wakeups would stop.

    Esben


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-14 23:05    [W:0.028 / U:3.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site