lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.16-rc6-rt1
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote:
>
> [...]
> no. We have to run deadlock detection to avoid things like circular lock
> dependencies causing an infinite schedule+wakeup 'storm' during priority
> boosting. (like possible with your wakeup based method i think)
No, all tasks would just settle on the highest priority and then the
wakeups would stop.

Esben


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-14 23:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans