lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: question: pid space semantics.
From
Date
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 11:43 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The question:
> If we could add additional pid values in different pid spaces to a
> process with a syscall upon demand would that lead to an
> implementation everyone could use?

So, you'd basically only allocate the cross-namespace pids when you
needed to do some kind of cross-namespace management?

pid_t alloc_local_pid(container_handle, pid_t pid_inside_container)

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-14 20:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans