Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:18:12 -0300 | From | j4K3xBl4sT3r <> | Subject | Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? |
| |
On 3/13/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:41:27PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:27 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > # latencies up to 80% slower > > > > This is certainly bullshit, it has not been true since 2.6.7 or so. > > > > Did not visit the page but that list smells like they are selling > > something. > > The might be issues already fixed in 2.6.15 (he tested the then-current > 2.6.11.7) or there might be powerpc specific problems, but after a quick > look at this page it looks like a serious page. > > He also posted the complete lmbench results, dmesg's and .config's at > his page, and from a first view I'd say he has very well documented > what and how he measured. > > > Lee > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > >
Ye, I just compiled the lastest kernel, 2.6.15.6, it seems a lot faster than my old one, 2.6.15.4, with the same configuration, and faster to compile, even I was compiling dietlibc (that incredible got only 10MB). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |