Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:13:23 -0800 | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance |
| |
Zach Brown wrote: >>Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything. > > I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative > load on the TLB. What would be interesting is seeing the effect > vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy > pressure on the TLB.
Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?
Regards,
Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |