lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: sysctls inside containers
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 13:19 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
    > > On another note, after messing with putting data in the init_task for
    > > these things, I'm a little more convinced that we aren't going to want
    > > to clutter up the task_struct with all kinds of containerized resources,
    > > _plus_ make all of the interfaces to share or unshare each of those.
    > > That global 'struct container' is looking a bit more attractive.
    >
    > have you noticed that ipc/mqueue.c uses netlink to send messages?
    > This essentially means that they are tied as well...

    Nope, I missed that.

    But, netlink is probably a completely separate issue, at least for now.
    I'm sure we're going to have "container leaks" and boundary violations
    for a long time, but I'll add netlink to the list.

    -- Dave

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-10 20:01    [W:0.021 / U:0.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site