lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

    > Two questions on this
    > 1. It is not standard ethernet nor standard IP over Infiniband either, is it?

    Correct.

    > Is there some documentation on the wire protocol that you use?

    No, but the encapsulation is very simple and easy to figure out from
    reading the code.

    > Is it pathscale specific?

    It doesn't have to be.

    > 2. Are there practical reasons why you get lower latency and higher
    > bandwidth with this than with IPoIB?

    The principal reason is that we haven't had time to pay attention to
    IPoIB performance yet. The ipath_ether driver was developed before
    IPoIB was usable for any real work.

    > If there are optimizations, can they not be added to the standard, common
    > IP over IB driver?

    That's certainly our intention. It's simply a matter of finding the
    time for it.

    <b

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-10 17:05    [W:0.024 / U:92.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site