[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
    On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 08:57 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 20:58 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
    > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 17:00 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > >
    > > > They are in the latest -mm tree if you wish to use them. Unfortunatly
    > > > it might look like they will not work out, due to the per-cpu relay
    > > > files not working properly with Paul's patches at the moment.
    > >
    > > Hmm, OK.
    > >
    > > > What's wrong with debugfs?
    > >
    > > It's not configured into the kernels of either of the distros I use (Red
    > > Hat or SUSE). I can't have a required part of my driver depend on a
    > > feature that's not enabled in the major distro kernels.
    > sucks to be you, however I think it's equally or even more unacceptable
    > to cripple the main kernel because you want to also support antique
    > kernels (those more than 12 months old).

    What antique kernels? It's not enabled in the latest SLES beta
    (2.6.16-git6 or so), or in Fedora rawhide (also 2.6.16-git).

    They mightn't be exactly today's kernels, but they're no more than two
    or three weeks old. CONFIG_DEBUG_FS has been in the kernel for a long
    time, and it's still not being picked up.

    > The general rule is "if you
    > want to support that, do it outside the tree".

    Which "that" are you referring to?


    Bryan O'Sullivan <>

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-10 14:54    [W:0.044 / U:11.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site