Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:51:38 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 |
| |
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 02:32:35 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > > > > > Useful, thanks. So the second batch of /proc patches are indeed the problem. > > > > If you have (even more) time you could test > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm2-pre1.gz. > > That's the latest of everything with the problematic sysfs patches reverted > > and Eric's recent /proc fixes. > > > > I just tried rc5-mm1 and this. With this I can run java apps/applets again > without locking my system. > > I also applied the patch you posted for inotify, but now I get this new one: > > Mar 1 15:11:04 werewolf kernel: [ 1424.891482] BUG: warning at fs/inotify.c:410/set_dentry_child_flags()
Which patch was that? The first one was doubly broken.
This is closer.
diff -puN fs/dcache.c~inotify-lock-avoidance-with-parent-watch-status-in-dentry-fix fs/dcache.c --- devel/fs/dcache.c~inotify-lock-avoidance-with-parent-watch-status-in-dentry-fix 2006-03-01 12:16:22.000000000 -0800 +++ devel-akpm/fs/dcache.c 2006-03-01 12:18:34.000000000 -0800 @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static void dentry_iput(struct dentry * if (inode) { dentry->d_inode = NULL; list_del_init(&dentry->d_alias); + dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_INOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED; spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); spin_unlock(&dcache_lock); if (!inode->i_nlink) _
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |