lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:34:30PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:54:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:42:35PM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > > So, queing alot URBs is the recommended way to sustain the bus? Allowing
> > > way bigger buffers will not be realistic?
> >
> > 16Kb is "way big" in the USB scheme of things aready. Look at the size
> > of your endpoint. It's probably _very_ small compared to that. So no,
> > larger buffer sizes is not realistic at all.
>
> As a data point, I have traces of a scanner session including a
> download of a 26Mb binary image using 524288 bytes logical blocks
> physically transferred with 61440 bytes bulk_in frames. Seems stable
> enough. IIRC the scanner-side controller chip has some advanced
> buffering just to handle that kind of bandwidth.

That's impressive. What are the endpoint sizes on the device that did
this?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-01 23:47    [W:0.067 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site