Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:58:31 +0100 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-09:
> DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net> wrote: > > > > other half doesn't have it probably has a bad user interface. You > > know that if a program uses a naming convention different from ALL > > the rest of programs is because the program has a problem. You know > > that if the only UNIX program out there that doesn't use /dev entries > > to talk to devices is cdrecord, the problem *probably* is in > > cdrecord, and not in UNIX... > > So why do you like to introduce a different naming scheme?
It is striking that Jörg Schilling's code alone uses this naming scheme, and nothing else appears to be. If there is, perhaps naming a few typical real-world applications could enlighten us. You haven't mentioned examples yet, so there isn't even a faint hint cdrecord is consistent with the so-called real-world.
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |