[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: add an ADVANCED_USER option
    >> > config ADVANCED_USER
    >> > bool "ask questions that require a deeper knowledge of the kernel"
    >> > config EXPERIMENTAL
    >> > bool "Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers"
    >> > depends on ADVANCED_USER
    >> Shouldn't this be the other way around, i.e. ADVANCED_USER depending
    >No, if there's a dependency between the two, then in this direction.

    ACK. Advanced code is not necessarily "incomplete code/drivers".

    >> If you implement it as above, people will set ADVANCED_USER to "n" in
    >> oldconfig and then be surprised that all experimental drivers are
    >> gone.
    >What about no dependency between ADVANCED_USER and EXPERIMENTAL?
    Sounds good.

    Jan Engelhardt
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-09 17:10    [W:0.022 / U:17.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site