[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: add an ADVANCED_USER option
>> > config ADVANCED_USER
>> > bool "ask questions that require a deeper knowledge of the kernel"
>> > config EXPERIMENTAL
>> > bool "Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers"
>> > depends on ADVANCED_USER
>> Shouldn't this be the other way around, i.e. ADVANCED_USER depending
>No, if there's a dependency between the two, then in this direction.

ACK. Advanced code is not necessarily "incomplete code/drivers".

>> If you implement it as above, people will set ADVANCED_USER to "n" in
>> oldconfig and then be surprised that all experimental drivers are
>> gone.
>What about no dependency between ADVANCED_USER and EXPERIMENTAL?
Sounds good.

Jan Engelhardt
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-09 17:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean