Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:40:46 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction |
| |
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:28:31PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >I did this to the scheduler last year - see > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111404726721747&w=2 > It's really interesting! > Have you tested fairness of your solution and it's performance overhead?
What do you mean by fairness, exactly?
As for its overhead, I just got it working inside UML. I tried it on x86_64, but something was wrong with the low-level switching stuff, and the machine hung whenever a guest scheduler process tried to run. So, I never got any real measurements.
I had better things to do, so I dropped this and went back to them.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |