lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:28:31PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >I did this to the scheduler last year - see
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111404726721747&w=2
> It's really interesting!
> Have you tested fairness of your solution and it's performance overhead?

What do you mean by fairness, exactly?

As for its overhead, I just got it working inside UML. I tried it on
x86_64, but something was wrong with the low-level switching stuff,
and the machine hung whenever a guest scheduler process tried to run.
So, I never got any real measurements.

I had better things to do, so I dropped this and went back to them.

Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-09 16:42    [W:0.207 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site