Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:13:48 -0800 (PST) | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: "Changelog-2.6.15": missing signoffs, descriptions |
| |
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Kurt Wall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 03:00:01PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap took 50 lines to write: > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Linda Walsh wrote: > > > > > Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:06:05PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > > > > > > > >> Actually, ("talking" to myself?), parsing this file a bit more, > > > >> I find many (~134) that are missing "Sign-offs". > > > >> > > > >> I take it that "Sign-off"s are also "optional" on commits > > > >> and represent that the author specified under the "commit" > > > >> tag did not need a "Sign-off"? > > [...] > > > Linda, did you have some other point that you are trying to get to, > > or is that it? There are real efforts being made, although not > > perfect. That happens when people are involved. > > Anyway, it feels like you are just getting to the surface/edge > > of your complaint. > > The way I read this thread, I thought the complaint was that she's > having difficulty writing one or more tools to process the changes > automatically. Perhaps I'm not seeing past the surface.
You could be right, but then she has solved it (noted as "optional" fields above). Good.
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |