lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    On Po 06-02-06 22:17:04, Lee Revell wrote:
    > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote:
    > > With uswsusp it'll be more flexible in that you'll be able to use any
    > > userland process or library to transform the image before storing it, but
    > > the suspend and resume processes are going to be a lot more complicated.
    > > For instance, how are you going to tell the kernel that you need the
    > > uswsusp UI binary, /bin/gzip and /usr/bin/gpg to run after the rest of
    > > userland has been frozen?
    >
    > Unless someone at least gives a rough estimate of 1) what % of users
    > can't suspend their laptops now and 2) of these, what % are helped by
    > suspend2, this thread is just handwaving...

    and 3) for what % of users, suspend2 will actually break it (bugs
    happen).

    Anyway it seems to be something like 1) 90% 2) 1% 3) .5%

    Pavel
    --
    Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-07 10:36    [W:0.019 / U:66.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site