lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    Date
    Hi.

    On Tuesday 07 February 2006 19:33, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > On Po 06-02-06 22:17:04, Lee Revell wrote:
    > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote:
    > > > With uswsusp it'll be more flexible in that you'll be able to use any
    > > > userland process or library to transform the image before storing it, but
    > > > the suspend and resume processes are going to be a lot more complicated.
    > > > For instance, how are you going to tell the kernel that you need the
    > > > uswsusp UI binary, /bin/gzip and /usr/bin/gpg to run after the rest of
    > > > userland has been frozen?
    > >
    > > Unless someone at least gives a rough estimate of 1) what % of users
    > > can't suspend their laptops now and 2) of these, what % are helped by
    > > suspend2, this thread is just handwaving...
    >
    > and 3) for what % of users, suspend2 will actually break it (bugs
    > happen).
    >
    > Anyway it seems to be something like 1) 90% 2) 1% 3) .5%

    And the source for your numbers is?....

    --
    See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info.
    http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-07 23:47    [W:5.043 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site