[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    On Po 06-02-06 19:37:13, Jim Crilly wrote:
    > On 02/07/06 12:51:40AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > This point is valid, but I don't think the users will _have_ _to_ switch to the
    > > userland suspend. AFAICT we are going to keep the kernel-based code
    > > as long as necessary.
    > >
    > > We are just going to implement features in the user space that need not be
    > > implemented in the kernel. Of course they can be implemented in the
    > > kernel, and you have shown that clearly, but since they need not be there,
    > > we should at least try to implement them in the user space and see how this
    > > works.
    > >
    > > Frankly, I have no strong opinion on whether they _should_ be implemented
    > > in the user space or in the kernel, but I think we won't know that until
    > > we actually _try_.
    > >
    > Some of the stuff belongs in userspace without a doubt, like the UI. But
    > why was the cryptoapi stuff added to the kernel if everytime someone goes
    > to use it people yell "That's too much complexity, do it in userspace!"?

    For stuff that can't be reasonably done in userspace, like encrypted
    loop. And notice that cryptoapi does *not* yet contain LZW.

    Web maintainer for ( wanted...
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-07 01:48    [W:0.070 / U:3.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site