lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

    Are you Max Dubois, second incarnation or what?

    > Well, given that the kernel suspend is going to be kept for a while,
    > wouldn't it be better if it was feature full? How would the users be at
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > a disadvantage if they had better kernel based suspend for a while,
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > followed by u-beaut-cooks-cleans-and-washes uswsusp? That's the part I
    > don't get...

    *Users* would not be at disadvantage, but, surprise, there's one thing
    more important than users. Thats developers, and I can guarantee you
    that merging 14K lines of code just to delete them half a year later
    would drive them crazy.

    Pavel
    --
    Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-07 01:47    [W:0.049 / U:34.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site