lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 01:53 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:

    > No, it would not. Merging suspend2 now would mean usable suspend
    > support for you in 3 or so months, but would push uswsusp forward year
    > or more.

    >From my perspective, uswsusp is pie in the sky. I don't care if it gets
    pushed back or not.

    On the other hand suspend2 works - NOW. And it ain't just me. Do you
    really think all these folks that are using suspend2 have an urge to
    patch their notebook kernels just because they feel like it?

    But hey, you seem to be bent on not having it - and you seem to be the
    one making that calls, so the rest of us that just want to use the
    notebooks properly will have to patch until someone decides that having
    something that works is more important than being right all the time.
    It's OK, have it your way.

    --
    Bojan

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-04 02:16    [W:4.223 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site