[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
On Friday 03 February 2006 00:35, David Schwartz wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean by the "GPL's license". If it's contained in
> the GPL, it's part of the GPL. The GPL is all of a piece.

"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."

Those two lines look like a copyright license for the GPL. It makes sense
for the GPL to be licensed under the GPL, but it's less than obvious to
me that that is actually the case.

Andrew Wade
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-03 14:34    [W:0.137 / U:33.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site