lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>>Fine-grained
>> message selection allows one to turn on only the messages needed, and
>> only for the controller desired.
>
>
> Except
>
> - There's (presently) no way of making all the messages go away for a
> non-debug build.

They aren't supposed to go away.


> - The code is structured as
>
> if (ata_msg_foo(p))
> printk("something");
>
> So if we later do
>
> #define ata_msg_foo(p) 0
>
> We'll still get copies of "something" in the kernel image (may be fixed
> in later gcc, dunno).

We don't do that in net driver land, and I don't wish to do it for
libata either. Its just a bit test, that jumps over code if the message
class isn't enabled (see link below).

We want users to be able to enable specific messages for specific
controllers, without recompiling their kernel.

grep for msg_enable in various net drivers. ethtool(8) is used to
select specific controllers and messages to print.


> - The new debug stuff isn't documented. One has funble around in the
> source to work out how to even turn it on. Can it be altered at runtime?
> Dunno - the changelogs are risible. What effect do the various flags
> have?

The model has always been documented:
http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/vortex/2001-November/001426.html
(scroll down a tad)

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-28 13:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans