lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
    On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > >Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
    > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
    > > >Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
    > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
    > > >Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
    > >
    > >
    > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy.
    > > It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
    >
    > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
    > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.

    It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
    goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
    regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
    earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.

    So please scratch that entry.

    --
    Jens Axboe

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-28 10:46    [W:0.021 / U:0.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site