lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > >Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > >Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> >
> >
> > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy.
> > It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
>
> It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.

It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.

So please scratch that entry.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-28 10:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans