Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: GFS2 Filesystem [13/16] | From | Steven Whitehouse <> | Date | Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:58:58 +0000 |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 14:30 -0800, Joel Becker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:59PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > --- a/fs/Kconfig > > > +++ b/fs/Kconfig > > > @@ -883,8 +884,6 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS > > > Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the > > > same system. One is not a replacement for the other. > > > > > > - If unsure, say N. > > > - > > > > Why? Most users probably still want configfs_fs=N. > > What version is this patch against? This line was removed from > mainline a while ago. > As to why it was removed, the discussion happened back then. > Basically, if something requires CONFIGFS_FS (eg, OCFS2) and is a > module, then a user is asked whether they want configfs as a module or > built-in. Text saying "say N" is completely incorrect there. > > Joel > Checking the gfs2 git tree and Linus' tree again reveals that its not something that we changed. I think I must have fed the wrong command to git to produce the diff as the change is quite clearly there, exactly same in both trees,
Steve.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |