[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Patch 4/4] Tell GCC 4.1 to move unlikely() code to a separate section
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    > On Monday 27 February 2006 16:31, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    >> This patch is more controversial I assume; it offers the option
    >> to use the gcc 4.1 option to move unlikely() code to a separate section.
    >> On the con side, this means that longer byte sequences are needed to jump
    >> to this code, on the Pro side it means that the unlikely() code isn't sharing
    >> icache cachelines and tlbs anymore.
    > I don't think this will do anything because the default Makefile
    > still has
    > CFLAGS += -fno-reorder-blocks
    > That was me because it made assembly debugging much easier. I would be willing
    > to reconsider this if you can give me some hard data just from this change:
    > - benchmark changes
    > - .text size increase
    > Also I don't like it being an separate CONFIG options. We already have too many
    > obscure ones. Either it should be on by default or not there at all.

    I think you just made the case for an option, if it does produce
    substantially better code and justify being done, you still would want a
    way to kill it for debugging.

    I'd like to see what it gains in general, and how much it depends on
    processor type and cache size.
    -bill davidsen (
    "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
    last possible moment - but no longer" -me

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-28 01:18    [W:0.019 / U:4.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site