lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm] swsusp: improve memory shrinking
    Date
    On Monday 27 February 2006 00:56, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > On Po 27-02-06 00:38:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > On Monday 27 February 2006 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > > On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > > > > > > > I did try shrink_all_memory() five times, with .5 second delay between
    > > > > > > > > them, and it freed more memory at later tries.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > I wonder if the delays are essential or if so, whether they may be shorter
    > > > > > > > than .5 sec.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > I was using this with some success... (Warning, against old
    > > > > > > kernel). But, as I said, I consider it ugly, and it would be better to
    > > > > > > fix shrink_all_memory.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Appended is a patch against the current -mm.
    > > > > > [It also makes
    > > > > > swsusp_shrink_memory() behave as documented for image_size = 0.
    > > > > > Currently, if it states there's enough free RAM to suspend, it won't bother
    > > > > > to free a single page.]
    > > > >
    > > > > Could we get bugfix part separately?
    > > >
    > > > Sure. Appended is the bugfix (I haven't tested it separately yet, but I think
    > > > it's simple enough) ...
    > >
    > > ... and this is the workaround of the "shrink_all_memory() returns 0 prematurely"
    > > problem (not tested separately yet). [Together these patches make my box
    > > actually free more memory when image_size = 0.]
    >
    > He he, move the workaround into mm/vmscan.c to get Andrew's attetion
    > then attempt to push it :-))). That way
    >
    > 1) shrink_all_memory() will get fixed for all callers
    >
    > 2) you'll probably force akpm to fix it the right way :-).

    Well, it looks like there are only two users of shrink_all_memory(), swsusp.c
    and kernel/power/main.c, so we can change its behavior.

    I think I'll leave swsusp.c as is and change shrink_all_memory() to
    "try harder". ;-)

    Greetings,
    Rafael
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-27 01:16    [W:0.022 / U:2.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site