Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:50:19 -0500 |
| |
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:32 +0000, Nix wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Al Viro moaned: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:46:32PM +0000, Nix wrote: > >> (i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.) > > > > The bug is in spewing tons of false positives, reducing S/N on that > > warning to nearly useless level. Note that in this case actually > > missing some would be more useful if what remains is less diluted > > by crap. > > I think this might be <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5035>. >
Al posted a quite compelling analysis of this bug a while back that's much better than anything in that bug report, of course I can't find it right now.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |