[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))
Tim Walberg <> wrote:

> >> > 'accepted "bugs" not being fixed' is not equivalent to 'package is
> >> > not being maintained'... at least not in my admittedly meager grasp
> >> > of logic...
> >>
> >> They told me that fixing would take "a while". If you believe that
> >> "a while" is 20 years, then you seem to live in a different universe then I do.
> >>
> Indeed... I had already concluded that. It now seems that in
> your universe, the time span between 1999 and 2006 is on
> the order of 20 years, which seems to be a factor of nearly
> 3 over what it is in my universe (either that, or it's not
> 2006 where you are, but rather 2019...).

I don't know in which universe you live, but in my universe software that does
not fix severe bugs after 7 years or does not publish a new version at least every
2-3 years is called deas and unmaintained. Both applies to GNU make.


-- (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin (uni) (work) Blog:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-24 11:13    [W:0.222 / U:1.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site