lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] cleanup __exit_signal()
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:13:22PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:04:03PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > This patch factors out duplicated code under 'if' branches.
> > > Also, BUG_ON() conversions and whitespace cleanups.
> >
> > Passed steamroller. Looks sane to me.
>
> Oh, thanks!
>
> I forgot to say it, but I had run steamroller tests too before I
> sent "some tasklist_lock removals" series.

Glad to hear it!

> Do you know any other test which may be useful too?

Matt Wilcox mentioned that a full build of gdb ran some tests that do
a good job of exercising signals. I have not yet tried this myself
(but am giving it a shot).

Also, my guess is that you ran steamroller on x86 (how many CPUs?).
I ran on ppc64.

Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-25 01:22    [W:0.051 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site