Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:20:29 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] cleanup __exit_signal() |
| |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:13:22PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:04:03PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > This patch factors out duplicated code under 'if' branches. > > > Also, BUG_ON() conversions and whitespace cleanups. > > > > Passed steamroller. Looks sane to me. > > Oh, thanks! > > I forgot to say it, but I had run steamroller tests too before I > sent "some tasklist_lock removals" series.
Glad to hear it!
> Do you know any other test which may be useful too?
Matt Wilcox mentioned that a full build of gdb ran some tests that do a good job of exercising signals. I have not yet tried this myself (but am giving it a shot).
Also, my guess is that you ran steamroller on x86 (how many CPUs?). I ran on ppc64.
Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |