Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:16:43 -0800 (PST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] slab: Don't scan cache_cache |
| |
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> > > The cache_cache object cache is used for bootstrapping, but the cache is > essentially static. It is unlikely that we ever have more than one page > allocated for it. As SLAB_NO_REAP is gone now, fix a regression by skipping > cache_cache explicitly in cache_reap().
There are other essentially static caches as well. Could we have something more general?
Are you really seeing any measurable regression? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |