Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:13:56 -0500 | From | "Jun'ichi Nomura" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2) |
| |
Hi,
Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > This patch needs splitting up so that independent changes can be > considered separately. > > c.f. The proposal from Mike Anderson (repeated below) which I prefer > because it makes it clear that a table always belongs to exactly one md.
I like his proposed patch. The interface is useful for my purpose too and moving table creation inside _hash_lock means I don't need dm_get() neither.
Is it going to be pushed to upstream? I'll remake my patch based on it.
-- Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |