Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:33:29 +0100 | From | Matthias Hensler <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:24:18AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:15 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > Isn't this what happend with swusp? I tried it of a period of time > > when it was included in mainline, it was just buggy and nothing much > > improved. > > And you never explained why you can't try a recent version...
I said I surely will :-)
However, there wasn't a recent version until a short time before. I just did what you do in situations where you need a working solution: you stick to the most promising thing. While swsusp looked abandoned there was a huge work going on with Suspend 2.
As work started again on swsusp recently I will try that, but from what I have read so far it looks like swsusp is scheduled to become deprecated anyway and work will be put into uswsusp. That is all I complain about, it means throwing away everything that is working, or easy to get it working, and delaying working hibernate support for another time.
Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |