Messages in this thread | | | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | Date | Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:44:34 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Maybe you feel you are in a power position because your code happened > > to enter the kernel first, so you few you can have veto power over all > > other contenders. It sometimes works that way, but only up to a > > Unfortunately, I do not need to veto suspend2. It is so complex that > it vetoes itself. Last time akpm stopped it, IIRC.
I'm going to let most of the last 8 hours' emails float by without reply, but think I should comment here.
I don't believe I've ever seen an email from Andrew stopping a merge, and I shouldn't have, because I've never asked him to merge it. Being the perfectionist that I am, I've sought to get it as stable, reliable and comment-clean as I reasonably could before merging.
Regards,
Nigel -- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |