Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:30:47 +0100 |
| |
On Monday 20 February 2006 21:15, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On 2/20/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:54 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was > > > working > > > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > > > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > > > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > > > > somehow... > > > > > > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). > > > > You do know that message is harmless and doesn't actually do anything > > right? It's just warning you that the kernel allowed something to hog > > the CPU without rescheduling for a LONG time. > > Well, if that is harmless I am not sure what you'd call harmful ;) > because right after this message the box hangs solid and I have to > push and hold power button to power it off and start again.
Now this means you get the "softlockup watchdog" message because of a bug that hangs your box and is actually detected by the watchdog. I didn't realize that before, so please disregard my previous messages.
Have you tried to boot the box with "init=/bin/bash" and suspend? [You'll have to mount /proc and /sys, and do "swapon -a" manually before "echo disk > /sys/power/state".]
Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |