Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:41:02 -0500 | From | "Dmitry Torokhov" <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > Pavel Machek wrote: > > .. > > >...so yes, it works... > > > > About 50% of the time for me. The rest of the time I just > > see a complete fresh boot from scratch. What a pain! > > Ouch... strange. Does it work reliably from init=/bin/bash boot? Do > you see final steps of writing on the screen? Can you submit it to > bugzilla.kernel.org? >
I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail somehow...
For the record - I never tried swsuspend2 as I am tracking the tip of Linus's tree and prefre to have the tree clean for my work anyway.
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |