lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
    > > Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > ..
    > > >...so yes, it works...
    > >
    > > About 50% of the time for me. The rest of the time I just
    > > see a complete fresh boot from scratch. What a pain!
    >
    > Ouch... strange. Does it work reliably from init=/bin/bash boot? Do
    > you see final steps of writing on the screen? Can you submit it to
    > bugzilla.kernel.org?
    >

    I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working
    OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup
    detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I
    somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail
    somehow...

    For the record - I never tried swsuspend2 as I am tracking the tip of
    Linus's tree and prefre to have the tree clean for my work anyway.

    --
    Dmitry
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-20 15:43    [W:4.319 / U:0.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site