lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Which is simpler?
Date
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

>> Ah, and now the part I really like, some hard numbers:
>> swsusp takes between 26 and 30 seconds to suspend (in my four tries: 26,
>> 30, 28, 26) and between 35 and 45 seconds to resume (35, 45, 39, 37).
>>
>> Suspend 2 does suspend in around 14-16 seconds, and resume in 18 to 21.
>>
>> That is factor 2!
>
> Does that include time to boot resume kernel? It will not be that
> dramatic with that time included, and it is only fair to include
> it. Anyway uswsusp solves that issue.

On my old ThinkPad, the difference is more like a factor of 3 to 4 -
from the moment I press the power button until X is up and running.

Suspend2 resumes faster than Windows 2000 on this machine.
--
Hilsen Harald.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-20 15:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans