lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler?
    Date
    Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

    >> Ah, and now the part I really like, some hard numbers:
    >> swsusp takes between 26 and 30 seconds to suspend (in my four tries: 26,
    >> 30, 28, 26) and between 35 and 45 seconds to resume (35, 45, 39, 37).
    >>
    >> Suspend 2 does suspend in around 14-16 seconds, and resume in 18 to 21.
    >>
    >> That is factor 2!
    >
    > Does that include time to boot resume kernel? It will not be that
    > dramatic with that time included, and it is only fair to include
    > it. Anyway uswsusp solves that issue.

    On my old ThinkPad, the difference is more like a factor of 3 to 4 -
    from the moment I press the power button until X is up and running.

    Suspend2 resumes faster than Windows 2000 on this machine.
    --
    Hilsen Harald.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-20 15:11    [W:0.045 / U:60.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site