Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:42:13 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: Development tree, PLEASE? |
| |
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:31:56PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:19:22PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 davej davej 1753 Dec 15 23:31 linux-2.6-bzimage.patch > > > > > > To get around some gynamstics in the rpm spec, defining a seperate build target > > > for every arch, we make every arch grok 'bzImage'. Fugly, but it keeps the > > > spec cleaner to maintain. > > > > Yup - seen it before. Did not like it. > > Consistent use of KBUILD_IMAGE across relevant architectures should buy > > you the same simplicity and a mergeable approach. > > tbh, patches like this just sit there, as 'they just work', rarely need > rediffing, the benefit to other people of it being upstream are next to nil > (or someone else would've done it by now), and I'm more motivated to work on > real problems like finding out why we've 3 different flavours of slab corruption right now.
Fair enough. I expected you to ask me to do it ;-) Good luck with the slab stuff.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |