lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    On 01/31/06 02:37:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
    > Juerg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> wrote:
    >
    > > > So why do people try to convince me that there is a need to avoid the standard
    > > > SCSI protocol stack because a PC might have only ATAPI?
    > > >
    > > > Major OS implementations use a unique view on SCSI (MS-win [*], FreeBSD, Solaris,
    > > > ...). Why do people believe that Linux needs to be different? What does it buy
    > > > you to go this way?
    > >
    > > Why do you believe that Linux needs to do the same as every other OS?
    >
    > Why do you believe that Linux needs to be worse than other OS?
    >

    Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e.
    mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different?

    > Jörg


    Jim.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-02 07:33    [W:0.058 / U:0.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site