lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
On 01/31/06 02:37:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Juerg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> wrote:
>
> > > So why do people try to convince me that there is a need to avoid the standard
> > > SCSI protocol stack because a PC might have only ATAPI?
> > >
> > > Major OS implementations use a unique view on SCSI (MS-win [*], FreeBSD, Solaris,
> > > ...). Why do people believe that Linux needs to be different? What does it buy
> > > you to go this way?
> >
> > Why do you believe that Linux needs to do the same as every other OS?
>
> Why do you believe that Linux needs to be worse than other OS?
>

Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e.
mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different?

> Jörg


Jim.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-02 07:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans