Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:39:11 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h |
| |
On Čt 02-02-06 13:16:40, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi, > > On St 01-02-06 23:45:15, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > So what's the plan for short-term? Are userspace suspend and suspend > > > modules mutually exclusive or can they co-exist? > > On 2/2/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > They can coexist for as long as neccessary. (At one point, it was even > > possible to suspend using userland code, then resume using kernel code > > :-). > > > > When I found out noone is really using kernel code any more (2.8.0 or > > something), I'd like to get rid of it. > > So are you saying we should pursue merging Suspend2 bits in the > mainline and deprecate it when userspace is mature enough and has all > the same features? Seems counter-productive but then again I am mostly > clueless of suspend issues.
No, I'm saying that suspend2 bits should be moved into userspace. That way we get mature userspace much faster, without any big merge into kernel. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |