Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:18:03 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3 |
| |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:14:31AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:09 +0000, Russell King wrote: > > where scsi_release() is the function called by the device model on the > > last put of a scsi device. > > > > I guess is more or less what you're trying to do invasively via the > > driver model. > > Yes ... except I think more than just SCSI has the problem (and we > actually have it in more than one release function) so it seems like a > good candidate for a general abstraction.
Maybe implementing it as a helper function would be the best and simplest solution?
static void scsi_release(struct device *dev) { schedule_release_process(dev, scsi_release_process); }
where schedule_release_process() contains more or less what I posted in the previous mailing.
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |