Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:35:20 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: + vmscan-rename-functions.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:09 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>shrink_zone and do_shrink_zone don't really say any more to me than >>shrink_zone and shrink_cache. > > > I know not everybody believes in a plugable reclaim policy, but that is > what I'm building. And from that POV I'd rather not see the > active/inactive names get used here. >
active/inactive is what we have now. If you manage to get a pluggable reclaim policy merged then I assure you, renaming these yet again will be the least of your worries :)
> My vote goes to Coywolf's suggestion. >
What was that?
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |