[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: disk geometry via sysfs
    Alan Cox wrote:
    > We have at least three
    > Disk reported C/H/S
    > BIOS reported C/H/S (hda/hdb only)
    > Actual C/H/S (if it exists)
    > Partition table C/H/S
    > A partitioning tool needs to know
    > Disk reported C/H/S
    > Partition table C/H/S
    > Preferably BIOS reported C/H/S if there is one

    Why do you say the partitioning tool needs to know the disk reported
    C/H/S? The value stored in the MBR must match the bios reported values,
    not the disk reported ones, so why does the partitioner care about what
    the disk reports?

    > The partition table C/H/S is on disk so trivial
    > The disk reported ones are in the identify block so could be pulled via
    > /proc and sysfs
    > The BIOS one is PC specific low memory poking around
    > I agree entirely that HD_GETGEO itself shouldn't matter.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-15 17:25    [W:0.022 / U:65.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site