Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:22:53 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 13:35 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 03:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:08 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 01:38 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem? > > > > > > No, it could be either, both, or neither. Heck, it _could_ be a > > > combination of all of the things in my experimental tree for that > > > matter. I put this patch out there because I know they're both bugs, > > > and strongly suspect it'll cure the worst of the interactivity related > > > delays. > > > > > > I'm hoping you'll test it and confirm that it fixes yours. > > > > Nope, this does not fix it. "time ls" ping-pongs back and forth between > > ~0.1s and ~0.9s. Must have been something else in the first patch. > > Hmm. Thinking about it some more, it's probably more than this alone, > but it could well be the boost qualifier I'm using...
OK, with 2.6.16-rc2-mm1, "ls" bounces around between 0.15s and 0.50s. Better than mainline but the large seemingly random variance is still perceptible and annoying. And, "ls | cat" behaves about the same as "ls", while on mainline it was consistently faster (!).
Do you have an updated patch against -mm that I can test?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |