Messages in this thread | | | From | Joerg Schilling <> | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:51:09 +0100 | Subject | Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter |
| |
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> >> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces? > >> > >> chownfn maybe. (fd + name) > > > >I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup. > >Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years. > > > This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.
I encourage you to read a mail before you answer to it. This may help you to avoid writing incorrect replies.
Jörg
-- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |