Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:07:26 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter |
| |
>> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces? >> >> chownfn maybe. (fd + name) > >I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup. >Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years. > This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.
Thank you, Jan Engelhardt -- | Software Engineer and Linux/Unix Network Administrator | Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/ | jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |