[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
Andrew Morton wrote:

> Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch. Just an
> assertion that it "should" help something.

The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't
reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have
piped up?

> I'm more inclined to revert it and not add the sysctl (ugh) until we have a
> good reason to do so.

If you revert this then Ken's database benchmark gets worse. Hence the

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-14 04:46    [W:0.062 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site