lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
Date
Hi,

On Monday 13 February 2006 22:24, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Phillip Susi wrote:
}-- snip --{
> You are complaining because you don't like the way USB was designed.
> That's fine, but it leaves you advocating a non-standardized position.
>
> Can you suggest a _reliable_ way to tell if the USB device present at a
> port after resuming is the same device as was there before suspending?

It seems to follow from your discussion that if I have a mounted filesystem
on a USB device and I suspend to disk, I can lose data unless the filesystem
has been mounted with "sync".

If this is the case, there should be a big fat warning in the swsusp
documentation, but there's nothing like that in there (at lease I can't find
it easily).

[If this is not the case, I've missed something and sorry for the noise.]

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-13 23:29    [W:0.127 / U:5.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site