Messages in this thread | | | From | Joerg Schilling <> | Date | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:18 +0100 | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
Florin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote: > > >>Could you explain why stat->st_dev / stat->st_ino POSIX semantics forces > >>POSIX implementations to have a stable stat->st_rdev number? > >> > >> > > > >I was never talking about stat->st_rdev > > > > > This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143 > > On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote: > > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to > POSIX? > > Correct. > > Jörg > > > You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were > talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an > outright lie.
You are lying here.
I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that I was referring to st_dev.
Jörg
-- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |