lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 07:35 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
    > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 17:08 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
    > > On Monday 13 February 2006 16:57, MIke Galbraith wrote:
    > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:37 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
    > > > > On Monday 13 February 2006 16:32, MIke Galbraith wrote:
    > > > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:05 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
    > > > > > > On Monday 13 February 2006 15:59, MIke Galbraith wrote:
    > > > > > > > Now, let's see if we can get your problem fixed with something that
    > > > > > > > can possibly go into 2.6.16 as a bugfix. Can you please try the
    > > > > > > > below?
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > These sorts of changes definitely need to pass through -mm first...
    > > > > > > and don't forget -mm looks quite different to mainline.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I'll leave that up to Ingo of course, and certainly have no problem
    > > > > > with them burning in mm. However, I must say that I personally
    > > > > > classify these two changes as being trivial and obviously correct
    > > > > > enough to be included in 2.6.16.
    > > > >
    > > > > This part I agree with:
    > > > > - } else
    > > > > - requeue_task(next, array);
    > > > > + }
    > > > >
    > > > > The rest changes behaviour; it's not a "bug" so needs testing, should be
    > > > > a separate patch from this part, and modified to suit -mm.
    > > >
    > > > Well, both change behavior, and I heartily disagree.
    > >
    > > The first change was the previous behaviour for some time. Your latter change
    > > while it makes sense has never been in the kernel. Either way I don't
    > > disagree with your reasoning but most things that change behaviour should go
    > > through -mm. The first as I said was the behaviour in mainline for some time
    > > till my silly requeue change.
    >
    > Ok, we're basically in agreement on these changes, it's just a matter of
    > when. As maintainer, Ingo has to weigh the benefit, danger, etc etc.

    Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem?

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-13 07:41    [W:4.067 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site