Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:38:45 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 07:35 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 17:08 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Monday 13 February 2006 16:57, MIke Galbraith wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:37 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > On Monday 13 February 2006 16:32, MIke Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:05 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 13 February 2006 15:59, MIke Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > > Now, let's see if we can get your problem fixed with something that > > > > > > > can possibly go into 2.6.16 as a bugfix. Can you please try the > > > > > > > below? > > > > > > > > > > > > These sorts of changes definitely need to pass through -mm first... > > > > > > and don't forget -mm looks quite different to mainline. > > > > > > > > > > I'll leave that up to Ingo of course, and certainly have no problem > > > > > with them burning in mm. However, I must say that I personally > > > > > classify these two changes as being trivial and obviously correct > > > > > enough to be included in 2.6.16. > > > > > > > > This part I agree with: > > > > - } else > > > > - requeue_task(next, array); > > > > + } > > > > > > > > The rest changes behaviour; it's not a "bug" so needs testing, should be > > > > a separate patch from this part, and modified to suit -mm. > > > > > > Well, both change behavior, and I heartily disagree. > > > > The first change was the previous behaviour for some time. Your latter change > > while it makes sense has never been in the kernel. Either way I don't > > disagree with your reasoning but most things that change behaviour should go > > through -mm. The first as I said was the behaviour in mainline for some time > > till my silly requeue change. > > Ok, we're basically in agreement on these changes, it's just a matter of > when. As maintainer, Ingo has to weigh the benefit, danger, etc etc.
Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |