lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/13] hrtimer: remove useless const
    Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >
    > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > your patch makes code larger on gcc3.
    > >
    > > By 120 bytes here. I dropped the patch.
    >
    > Is this really worth it? This _is_ a compiler problem, are we going to add
    > now const everywhere to work around a (small) compiler problem, which is
    > already fixed in newer versions?
    >

    Can't say I care a lot, but there doesn't seem much point in giving away
    the consts now we have them, if it just produces worse code.

    const arguments to functions are pretty useful for code readability and
    maintainability too, if you use them consistently.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-13 13:34    [W:0.021 / U:120.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site